Windows XP:
A New Operating System for Christmas?
Before launching into
the newsletter itself, I'd like to say "Thanks!" to all
the new subscribers -- we're almost to 300 now! -- and
another "Thanks!" to all of those who have waited since
mid-September for a new issue. I've been settling into a
new marriage, a new job, and a new season of college
basketball. I'm ecstatic over the new marriage, happy
with the job, and pretty irritated with the basketball
season (my Tarheels are 1-4 as I write this), but
haven't taken the time from everything else to put
together an issue of the newsletter in a while. We'll
try to get back on a monthly schedule as of this issue.
I haven't moved to a listserv provider yet, either, but
that's also on the front burner.
Now, to this month's
topic: Windows XP.
Win XP is out,
to great fanfare among the computerati and less
excitement from the rest of us. I grew up at the tail
end of that period of American history where, when one
family on the block got a new car, everyone else in the
neighborhood would run over to admire the brand new
flivver, Dad would beam and wipe invisible smudges from
the finish while modestly bragging on the thing's
abilities and accouterments, the family's kids would
strut around school for a week, and the rest of the
neighborhood would redouble their efforts to get a new
car in their driveways by year's end. For a
while, the same effect was evident among computer
owners: "Wow, you bought Windows 95?
Coooool. Can I play with it?" Now, with Win 98,
Millennium, 2000, and XP crowding the marketplace, fewer
computer owners feel compelled to rush out and buy the
new system. Nor do they feel the need to buy a new PC
with the latest system installed. I've decided that, as
far as this site goes, I'm not working the whole site
over to incorporate XP information in the pages. I do
have a
Windows XP
page which will attempt to keep up with the main XP news
and information; keep tabs on that for the latest.
As this newsletter is
targeted more for the home user and not the cutting
edge, high-end PC user, I'm making a pre-Christmas
recommendation: if you're thinking about getting Dad or
Sis a brand-new PC for the holidays, don't get a Windows
XP-based system. Don't.
Gee, Uncle Toejumper,
why not? Well, I imagine that a good number of
subscribers are already going "harrumph" over this
recommendation. If you're contemplating the switchover,
or have already made the switch, chances are you know
what you're doing and why. In the case of these readers,
more power to you! You've made what I trust is an
informed decision and my advice isn't necessary. Let me
know what your experiences are -- I'd like to
incorporate your successes and glitches into an upcoming
newsletter. And don't think I'm knocking XP. It is a
powerful and relatively efficient (well, for Microsoft)
system that exhibits tremendous stability and lots of
tempting new features for both casual and power users.
It is a very worthy effort, and will probably supplant
many 9x systems in the near future. I'm guessing that
within a year's time, most PC manufacturers will
routinely offer XP-driven systems as the standard for
their computers, and either not offering Win 98, 98SE,
or ME at all or at best as an alternative OS. The price
ain't right, either: $199 for a shelf copy of XP Home
($99 for an upgrade version, usable by Win 98/98SE/ME
owners only) and $299 for a shelf copy of XP Pro ($199
for an upgrade version for owners of Win 98/98SE/ME/NT
4/2000).
I'm addressing the
needs of the mass market computer user -- the average
Internet surfer, games player, office- or home worker,
chat maven, etc., who doesn't play with computers as a
hobby or work in a field that requires the most
up-to-date computing technology. For these folks, the
upgrade to Windows XP could be a tremendous hassle. Lots
of incompatibilities and install glitches are being
reported. A new machine with a factory-installed XP
won't present those problems, of course, but 9x users
are going to find that many of their favorite software
programs, from office suites to antivirus utilities to
games, won't work on XP or will demand updated or
rewritten versions to run under the new system. Even a
program that runs under Win NT/2K isn't guaranteed to
function under XP, and you can kiss all your old
DOS-based programs goodbye. Thinking of installing XP on
a machine built before 2000? Think twice. Microsoft
doesn't recommend it, even though independent testing
shows that XP runs well on machines as slow as 300MHz.
Upgrading from an older Win 95 or Win 3.1 machine? You
can't; you'll need to blow out the old system and
install a new, expensive copy of XP from scratch.
Have you actually seen
the XP interface? Yeeesh. AOL meets Nickelodeon. Lots of
splash and color at the expense of usability. Most
serious users go right back to the "Classic" interface,
but all of that supposedly cool stuff lurks around in
the system, unused and sucking up hard drive space.
Microsoft and third-party vendors will probably release
"skins" to change the look and feel of the XP interface
even more; this may or may not appeal to you. And
believe me, very few of us are going to be amused by the
doggy Search Assistant that pops up, tongue lolling,
every time you want to hunt down a file or folder.
The issue of
product activation is a sticky one as well.
Microsoft insists that you run the Product Activation
protocol within 30 days of installation/first usage of
XP; this lists your machine in Microsoft's databases,
and limits the amount of times you can reinstall the
system (i.e. onto a new computer or even as part of a
crash-prompted reinstallation). Worse, repeated system
upgrades can invalidate the system: if you give Uncle
Moe a new XP-based computer for Christmas, then he
spends the next year installing a new scanner, DVD
drive, memory card, video card, or what have you, he may
run into a situation where XP decides that his system
has been upgraded too many times and won't allow it to
continue. Your Uncle Moe will then have to call
Microsoft's Tech Support system and ask that they allow
-- allow -- him to continue the upgrade. The idea
is to prevent unscrupulous users from installing the
same copy of XP onto different machines (a copyright
violation), but it could also prevent honest XP users
from making too many changes to the same machine. That
prospect could send Uncle Moe's ulcer into meltdown. For
even more fun, Microsoft wants you to sign up for its
Passport service. Although the system tells you that
Passport is necessary for XP to run properly, it isn't.
Stay away from Passport -- it asks for entirely too much
personal information and is riddled with security flaws.
You don't even need it to run Outlook Express, but the
system will tell you differently.
Thinking of using an
XP-based machine on a home or office network? Well, it
will run great, but the Home version might not work well
with other machines in the network, particularly those
based on Win 2K. This means that you're stuck with using
the $200 Professional version, and lemme tell ya, little
buddy, XP Pro ain't for the faint-hearted. (It is,
however, the best operating system currently in the
Microsoft stable. If you're familiar with Win NT/2K
usage, you might give XP Pro a shot, though it's
probably unnecessary for the average home user -- sort
of like using a Ferrari for taking the kids to the
pediatrician.)
And notebook and
laptop users might want to remember that generic,
off-the-shelf OSes tend to misbehave on these machines.
If you want XP on your little ittlie, the best advice is
to buy a new one with XP installed at the factory.
So to sum up: unless
you know what you're doing, Win XP may prove more of a
hassle than a benefit to you. Certainly the average user
won't want to futz around with an XP upgrade, and the XP
system, while clearly superior to any of the 9x family
of systems, doesn't make the purchase of a new PC
worthwhile in and of itself. If you're already in the
market for a new machine, definitely consider an
XP-based machine, but don't toss your perfectly
functional Win 9x/ME computer overboard just because
there's a new kid on the auction block.
See you in 2002, and
have a great holiday season.